Each example below rebuilds a Tax Court of Canada SR&ED case as a structured project: objectives, uncertainties, hypotheses, experimentation and results. Pairing a win and a loss in each industry shows where the Court drew the line. All cases are listed on the SR&ED Tax Cases docket.
Software & IT
| Case | Project | Outcome | Key lesson | Materials |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acsis EHR 2016 TCC 50 | Distributed replication software for a health-records network with unreliable connectivity | ✓Win | No off-the-shelf method existed; contemporaneous notes and trial records documented the investigation | Project analysis Key criteria |
| Indusol Industrial Control 2020 TCC 103 | Marine control software & system integration | ✕Loss | Identifying a problem is not SR&ED; systematic investigation must be shown | Project analysis Key criteria |
Manufacturing & Engineering
| Case | Project | Outcome | Key lesson | Materials |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Buhler 2023 TCC 18 | Tractor design | ✓Win | Clear illustration of system uncertainties from integrating components | Project analysis Key criteria |
| Dave’s Diesel 2022 TCC 62 | Fuel-injector design process | ✕Loss | Evidence must show knowledge beyond what a BSc. in the field would already have | Project analysis Key criteria |
Construction & Materials
| Case | Project | Outcome | Key lesson | Materials |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beton Mobile 2019 CCI 278 | 10-18: Light self-compacting mortar for a mobile concrete mixer | ✓Win | Each eligible project was detailed against the five criteria (6 of 14 projects allowed) | Project analysis Key criteria |
| WRD Borger Construction 2021 TCC 40 | Pressure-activated removable plugs for large box culverts | ✕Loss | Trial and error on a business problem is not a technological uncertainty | Project analysis Key criteria |
Energy & Environment
| Case | Project | Outcome | Key lesson | Materials |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Airzone One 2022 | Optimizing passive monitoring of low-concentration air pollutants | ✓Win | 4 of 6 projects eligible; shows the cut-off between eligible and ineligible work | Project analysis Key criteria |
| Global Sustainable 2021 TCC 17 | Energy-efficient home construction | ✕Loss | Work deemed routine engineering; compare with the Airmax HVAC win | Project analysis Key criteria |
Food & Agri
| Case | Project | Outcome | Key lesson | Materials |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manning Canning Kitchens Inc. 2024 TCC 159 | Shelf-stable cold-pressed juice (“Chrisoda”) | ✓Win | Hypotheses tested with measurable observations (pH, microbial counts) | Project analysis Key criteria |
| Flavornet 2017 TCC 179 | Sterol beverage formulation and stability | ✕Loss | 4 of 5 criteria not met despite 12 prior years of accepted claims | Project analysis Key criteria |
Medical & Health
| Case | Project | Outcome | Key lesson | Materials |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andre Lamy MPC 2020 TCC 61 | Clinical research by a physician through a Medical Professional Corporation | ✓Win | Work by the doctor was performed on behalf of the MPC (“directly engaged”) | Project analysis Key criteria |
| LifeChoice 2017 TCC 21 | Oral chelation formulations (EDTA vs. DMSA) for arterial plaque | ✕Loss | No testing of hypotheses; analysis alone was not experimentation | Project analysis Key criteria |
Guidance Examples — CRA & USPTO
| Year | Example | Materials |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | CRA — Defining software technology (ICT guidelines, Mar. 22, 2017) | Project analysis |
| 2017 | Issues claiming SR&ED in Artificial Intelligence | Project analysis Key criteria |
| 2018 | CRA ICT example — blockchain consensus mechanism | Project analysis Key criteria |
| 2024 | USPTO AI examples — overview | Project analysis |
| 2024 | USPTO — AI anomaly detection method | Project analysis Key criteria |
| 2024 | USPTO — AI-assisted fibrosis treatment | Project analysis Key criteria |
| 2024 | USPTO — Transaxle design using AI | Project analysis Key criteria |
| 2024 | USPTO — Therapeutic cancer compound using AI | Project analysis Key criteria |
More project analyses (Allegro Wireless, A&D Precision, Atelier Béton, Dazzm and others) are linked directly from the Tax Cases docket. Questions or comments: registration@sredstakeholder.ca